| FUTURE
Forecasting and Understanding
Trends, Uncertainty
and Responses of the North Pacific Ecosystem
FISP Draft following Interim Science Board Meeting held in April
2006
Theme
To understand and forecast responses of North Pacific marine
ecosystems to climate change and human activities at basin-wide
and regional scales, and to broadly communicate this scientific
information to governments, resource managers and the general public
FUTURE, a new scientific program of PICES, will build on the success
of the Climate Change and Carrying Capacity (CCCC) Program and is
motivated by three important societal issues in the North Pacific:
| 1 |
The loss of resilience and productivity of natural
environmental capital, such as renewable resources and habitat,
and irreparable damage to non-renewable resources. |
| 2 |
The loss of socioeconomic opportunities due to natural and
anthropogenic change in marine ecosystems, and |
| 3 |
Increased uncertainty and risk in decision making faced by
managers and policy makers due to climate change and irreversible
ecosystem change. |
These issues drive the need for improved scientific information
to reduce uncertainty, to improve resource management and decision-making,
and to better communicate that information to all facets of society.
The implementation of FUTURE builds on the enhanced understanding
of marine ecosystems gained through programs like CCCC and GLOBEC
(Global Ocean Ecosystem Dynamics), the availability of the next
generation of IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) climate
projections, improved biological, physical, and geochemical time
series in the North Pacific, and substantially improved coupled
models for synthesizing existing data and testing key hypotheses
on the responses of North Pacific ecosystems to climate and human
forcing.
FUTURE will move beyond these previous research programs by focusing
on understanding the mechanisms underlying ecosystem response, by
developing a forecasting capability, and by providing estimates
of the uncertainty associated with these forecasts. The challenge
is not only to improve our scientific understanding of interactions
between the North Pacific Ocean, climate, biological processes and
human communities, but also to communicate this information effectively
to governments and society at large so they can set ‘wise-use’
policy and management directions in anticipation of the changes
we forecast. In short, we need to clarify, anticipate, and communicate
the linkages between climate, ecosystems and societies.
Central Scientific Issues
| |
Marine ecosystem responses on seasonal,
annual and decadal time scales. |
| |
Climate forcing of physical, biological and biogeochemical
processes at scales ranging from the entire North Pacific, to
marginal seas and convergence zones, to coastal regions relevant
to PICES member countries. |
| |
Ecological interactions and linkages between
coastal and offshore waters, western and eastern Pacific, northern
and equatorial Pacific, and marine, estuarine and freshwater
ecosystems. |
| |
The direct and indirect effects of human activities
such as fishing, aquaculture, species invasion, and pollution. |
| |
The cumulative impacts of multiple ecosystem
stresses on biological diversity. |
| |
Forecasting in a policy environment which communicates
the implications and uncertainties to decision-makers and the
general public through risk-based ecological assessments. |
Communication Issues
| |
The communication of PICES science
to natural resource managers, groups interested in the outcome
of management decisions and the general public. |
| |
Partnerships with organizations that focus on
the social and economic sciences to increase society’s
awareness of PICES science activities. |
| |
Effective communication to differing constituencies
in all PICES-member countries. |
Range of Key Research Activities
| |
Develop integrated models and assessments. |
| |
Investigate and improve our understanding of
mechanisms underlying ecosystem response to change. |
| |
Develop indicators of ecosystem status and condition
to meet conservation and management objectives. |
| |
Provide advice on the implementation of ocean
observing systems. |
| |
Simulate climate change and human impact scenarios
through interaction with key conservation and management bodies
in the North Pacific. |
| |
Develop integration and visualization tools to
communicate ecosystem knowledge and complexity. |
| |
Assess and communicate uncertainty and its implications
to managers, communities dependent on the ocean, and the general
public. |
| |
Develop integrated models and scenarios of ecosystem
change and data management protocols to support this research. |
Key Communication Activities
| |
Develop a PICES capability for the
communication of complex scientific findings. |
| |
Build partnerships with organizations already
doing outreach successfully. |
| |
Prepare and distribute press releases, newsletters,
public workshops, flyers and videos. |
The main challenge we face in developing FUTURE is in setting priorities
among the scientific issues, identifying possible key research activities
and communicating that science. We must ask ourselves the following
types of questions:
| |
What are the time and space scales
we should focus on in improving understanding of climate and
anthropogenic forcing? |
| |
What will be our primary foci for investigations
of ecological interactions and linkages among ecosystems? |
| |
Should we focus on a subset of human impacts;
if yes which ones and why? |
| |
What type of forecasts can and should we develop? |
The answers to these and related questions will provide better clarity
to science and resource managers in our member countries of the
value of FUTURE as the next integrative science program of PICES.
FUTURE will be of high value if it is complementary and synergistic
with the science and management needs for understanding, forecasting,
and communicating the linkages between climate, ecosystems, and
societies.
Draft Agenda
Open Forum on FUTURE
Annual Meeting, Yokohama Japan
Overview of FUTURE – Status Report
Discussion to begin to increase the specificity of the key research
activities of FUTURE
| |
Scientific Understanding –
What are the highest priority research activities? |
| |
Forecasts – What type of forecasts should
we develop? |
| |
Communication – What should be our focus
to broaden the communication of PICES science? |
Next Steps in developing the FUTURE Science Plan:
| |
Establish a writing team to draft a Science Plan. |
| |
Hold a workshop in April 2007 to refine the draft Science
Plan. |
| |
Review of the revised Science Plan within PICES. |
| |
Hold a workshop at next Annual Meeting to review and refine
Science Plan. |
| |
Seek outside peer review of the Science Plan. |
For more details on FISP Prorgram check FISP
theme proposals. |